Analysis.
For the first time in Nicaragua’s modern democratic history, the country will watch on Jan. 10 as an incumbent president hands himself the presidential sash for another term in office.
The opposition claims Daniel Ortega’s reelection has ruptured Nicaragua’s constitutional order, which bans consecutive presidential terms. They claim Ortega has pushed Nicaragua too far, tripping a dashboard warning light indicating the wheels are about to fall off the country’s democracy if the government doesn’t pull over immediately for a tune-up.
The Sandinistas, however, insist Ortega’s longevity offers Nicaragua a unique opportunity for continuity, growth and progress under a popular government that’s supported by the majority of voters. And many in Nicaragua’s business class seem to agree—at least in quieter moments— that the continuation of a strong government is good for business, if Ortega’s politics don’t trip up the economy.
That could be a big “if” as Nicaragua faces a number of daunting domestic and international challenges in the 2012, starting with next week’s scheduled visit by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, amid heightened tensions with Washington.
Next week the world will turn its eyes to Nicaragua as Ortega swears in for another term. But it’s Ahmadinejad they’ll be watching. And it could be a harbinger of trouble to come for Nicaragua if the Sandinista leader tries to cozy-up too much with his Iranian guest of honor, as he did with Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez during his 2007 inauguration.
What does continuity mean under Ortega?
Most Nicaraguans—all of them under 40—have never experienced government continuity. For the first time in more than three decades, the new boss will be the same as the old boss, and he won’t spend the first half of his term in office trying to undo the achievements of his predecessor.
Instead, Ortega will hit the ground running. When the Sandinista chief festoons himself in the presidential sash next week, he’ll already have political momentum, a solid working relationship with the IMF and the business community, a solid managerial grip on a growing economy, and a working government program already in place. Social programs will continue without upheaval or major tinkering, and the Sandinistas’ supermajority in the legislative National Assembly will be like handing Ortega the political football with nothing but open field between him and the end zone.
“I think the people voted for Daniel Ortega because they want to see continuity in something,” Comandante Bayardo Arce, Ortega’s top economic advisor, told The Nicaragua Dispatch in an interview after the presidential elections. “The people were afraid that another government was going to come along and start saying, ‘This is going to change, and no more ALBA, and no more this, that or the other thing.’ And once again, we would have to start from zero. We always start over.”
Arce says that part of Ortega’s success during his first five years in office was due, in fact, to his efforts to offer continuity to several of the programs implemented by his predecessor, President Enrique Bolaños. The radical changes that some feared Ortega would bring to bear in 2007 never happened, he said.
“I think this is the only government that didn’t erase everything (inherited from the previous administration). And that is one of the things that people recognize,” Arce said. “There were things that señor Bolaños was doing that were working well, and we continued to do them.”
Ortega’s reelection means continuity can now happen to an even greater degree, in all projects big and small. Even some of the megaprojects such as the Venezuelan-funded “Supreme Dream of Simon Bolivar” Oil Refinery, the 220-MW Tumarin Hydroelectric plant and the deep-water port at Monkey Point (projects that once seemed like populist-addled stargazing destined to be stuck in the same musty file holding the blueprints for the Nicaraguan Canal and filed under “D” for “Si Dios Quiere”) might now have at least a fighting chance of actually becoming real.
“No one can resolve, even minimally, the problems of a country in only five years,” says Arce. “A strategic project like Tumarin takes more than five years to do, so that extends beyond one presidential term.”
Arce, however, is not in favor of anyone—including Ortega—becoming president-for-life. “I think that after 10 years, if you don’t have your project moving forward, it’s time to stop trying,” he says.
Critics, meanwhile, claim it’s already time for Ortega to stop trying.
“When there is no legitimacy of origin, as is the case with the next Ortega government, because it’s not the product of a credible electoral process, sooner than later there will be a crisis and (the government) will have to pay for it,” predicts former opposition vice-presidential candidate Edmundo Jarquín.
Challenges Ahead
In addition to questions of legitimacy and legality, which threaten to hound Ortega’s administration for the next five years, the administration will also face a series of daunting challenges to both domestic and foreign policy.
Despite winning reelection with what appears to be an authoritative mandate and wresting unchecked control over all branches of government, the Ortega administration will be facing a difficult year ahead. Some of its main challenges are:
1. To Build political consensus for economic reforms.
The Sandinistas have enough votes to legislate unilaterally in the National Assembly, but they’ll need consensus to be successful.
According to Bayardo Arce, the most pressing agenda items on the docket for 2012 will be reforming the social security system, reforming the tax code and reforming the energy sector (namely, figuring out how Nicaragua is going to deal with rising energy costs without continuing to subsidize half the population).
The government and the private sector agreed to push off those issues until 2012, which allowed the Ortega administration to maintain relatively calm and harmonious relations with the business class for the past few years. But the government cannot continue to kick that can down the road any longer; the time to face those issues has come, and they will require political savvy.
“We have these three big and pressing issues that require ample consensus,” Arce told The Nicaragua Dispatch. “In none of these areas can we make decisions that favor workers over business, or business over workers. All of these decisions need to be made in agreement, even though we have the majority.”
2. Deepen social programs, improve poverty-relief programs
The government will be challenged to increase the effectiveness and reach of its social programs, as well as figure out new ways to make them more inclusive and sustainable.
New data from the Nicaraguan Development Institute (INDE) suggests the government programs aren’t as effective at reducing poverty as the administration claims, according to economic analyst Adolfo Acevedo.
At the behest of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB, or BID in Spanish), INDE recently published its poverty relief numbers for 2009—data that, until now, has been guarded jealously by the Sandinista administration; it reveals that only 12.5% of the population has received aid from government programs, while 87.5% said they haven’t received anything.
Acevedo broke those numbers down even further to discover that only 10% of benefiting families are living in extreme poverty, while almost 65% of households getting government social aid were already above the poverty line.
“This is a little strange for programs that are designed to reduce poverty,” Acevedo says.
The economist also found that the great majority of those who say they have benefited from government programs were referring to traditional government aid in the form of vaccination campaigns and efforts to improve education enrollment. Acevedo says that only 3.2% of the population has benefited from new “ALBA” social programs funded by Venezuelan aid, suggesting that the perception of ALBA aid is greater than its real impact.
The government, meanwhile, is focusing on other statistics. The same home survey suggests that extreme poverty in Nicaragua dropped from 48.3% in 2005 to 42.5% in 2009, an achievement the administration is happy to take credit for.
The government notes that it has benefited thousands of people with poverty-relief programs such as Hambre Cero, which provides small farmers with pregnant chickens, pigs and cows, and Usura Cero, which provides women with micro-loans. The government has also advanced on efforts to provide roofing materials and property titles to tens of thousands of Nicaraguans.
The challenge moving forward will be for the government to show that these programs are not designed only as vote-generating charity for party supporters, rather programs that are able in reduce poverty in a sustainable way.
The Sandinistas will have to deliver this term; blaming every shortcoming on the “16 years of neoliberal governments” doesn’t cut it after more than five years in office.
3. Respect freedom of expression, reduce polarization
New claims of political persecutions and government intolerance towards the opposition continue to punch holes in the administration’s slogan of “reconciliation and national unity.”
Since the elections, the opposition claims the number of death threats, arbitrary police detentions and cases of political persecution have increased dramatically.
“There are now political prisoners and people who are being persecuted politically,” Molina told the daily La Prensa this week. “We are documenting the information and will file formal complaints with the human-rights organizations.
Activist lawyer Lulio Marenco claims he is one of the people the government has recently started to persecute for political reasons. Last week, police raided Marenco’s home and office with a capture order issued by a supplemental judge (the root of much judicial mischief in Nicaragua).
Marenco, who claims he is on the lam, emailed The Nicaragua Dispatch this week from a cyber café in Managua to say the warrant for his arrest was issued without due cause as political retribution for filing a criminal complaint against Supreme Electoral Council president Roberto Rivas, whom the lawyer accused late last year of illegal enrichment, fraud and corruption, among other charges (the case was thrown out of Nicaraguan court without consideration).
If tolerance is not improved quickly—especially in Nicaragua’s allegedly independent government institutions— the situation will only complicate the Sandinistas’ legitimacy issues.
4. Maintain majority support
Ortega’s victory in the Nov. 6 general elections was thanks to independent voters. But winning the elections was the easy part; maintaining that support will be a challenge in the New Year.
Veteran Nicaraguan pollster Raúl Obregón cautions Ortega to not let the support of independents go to his head, the way the opposition did in the past. He says the president would be “making a serious mistake” if he thinks his party has grown and that he has a mandate for change.
“Ortega’s support is still 34 percent hard-line Sandinistas, and 24 percent soft vote (independents),” Obregón said. “The Sandinista Front has not grown, but its support has.”
5. Improve citizen security
Nicaragua likes to advertise itself as the safest country in Central America. But given that Central America is the most violent region in the world, Nicaragua’s superlative claim is a bit like bragging about being the best arm-wrestler in the nursing home.
Rather than comparing itself to its horribly messed-up neighbors, Nicaragua needs to focus on improving its own situation.
Nicaragua’s police and army have done a commendable job combating organized crime, drugs and gangs. But they need to avoid the traps of Sandinista triumphalism and politicization, both of which threaten to weaken their institutional response to crime and insecurity.
The recent reappearance of armed groups in the rural north and northeast of the country is also worrisome and potentially represents the visible tip of an iceberg of political discontent and social unrest.
The government has responded militarily, hunting down and killing leaders of the armed groups. But history warns that military solutions and repression could exacerbate the violence if the government is not willing to take an honest look at what’s causing the problems.
6. Avoid crazy foreign policy
The Sandinista government’s approach to foreign policy could be its Achilles’ heel in 2012.
The success of Ortega’s government over the past five years has been thanks to its ability to play all sides by establishing beneficial relations with Venezuela and other “new friends” while maintaining solid ties to the United States, traditional allies and international financial institutions.
This will all go to pot if Ortega continues to defiantly court the friendship of Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who will take time off from test-firing cruise missiles to attend Ortega’s inaugural fiesta next week.
The delicacy of the Iranian issue was underscored last weekend when U.S. President Barack Obama signed into law tough new sanctions that could punish foreign governments that deal with Iran’s central bank on oil transactions. Though Nicaragua does not buy oil from Iran, the sanctions send a clear message on the eve of Ahmadinejad’s tour of the Americas that the United States will not be sympathetic to foreign countries that try to deepen relations with Tehran.
For Nicaragua, this could spell serious trouble if Ahmadinejad arrives in Managua with a basket full of goodies and promises to strengthen ties with Nicaragua.
If Ortega embraces Ahmadinejad on his find-a-friend tour of the hemisphere, it will make Nicaragua a pariah in Central America and give the United States the excuse it needs to turn the screws on Nicaragua—just at a time when the country appears to be coming into bloom.
Climbing into bed with Ahmadinejad would play into the hands of hard-line Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill who are already trying to move Nicaragua from the category of “drug-war ally” to “friend of my enemy.”
Ortega is a pragmatic leader, despite his administration’s frequent rhetorical outbursts—a sort of political Tourette syndrome that the president has been able to manage with responsible actions to compensate for the kooky comments.
But Ortega is taking a bad gamble if thinks he can manage the same balancing act with Iran that he has pulled off so admirably with Venezuela.
Sandinista officials like to say they can be friends with any country they want to, regardless of what the United States thinks. And they are right.
But in the world of realpolitik, which is still the world to which Nicaragua belongs, it matters who your friends are. By flirting with countries like Iran and North Korea, Nicaragua appears to be modeling its foreign policy on the social behaviors of a rebellious high school student who doesn’t know which group to sit with in the cafeteria.
Just because Nicaragua can befriend whomever it wants, doesn’t mean it’s a good idea for it to chum around with the pipeheads hanging out by the train tracks.
The Sandinistas’ economic success over the past five years has been due, in great part, to its continued ties to the United States, Nicaragua’s main trade partner and main source of tourism.
It would be foolish to give that up to hang out with the oddball members of the world’s “Breakfast Club.”



It’s getting to be boring having to set the record straight with all of the above.
Of course it can be very rewarding to have a dictatorship problem is that sooner rather than latter you will learn the meaning something Nicaraguans say or “poner indios a repartir chicha” and this is nothing against the locals but when you have a rather short crowd around “el jefe” they fight for power and riches among themselves, the seed of destruction begins to act and due to the dictatorship structures there is simply no way out except for your typical banana Republic, Woody Allen outcome.
Just wait…
It’s a shame and really amazing to see that the USA has so much power. “U.S. President Barack Obama signed into law tough new sanctions that could punish foreign governments that deal with Iran”. If the USA does not approve and punishes…that sounds dictatorial. It’s the same as Cuba: The whole world wants the embargo to end except the USA. Not all countries are equal and some of them are waking up. It’s about time some equilibrium comes back to our planet.
Supporting Cuba and Iran while attacking the U.S. leaves you with no credibility as an objective and fair minded political observer, only a Left Wing zealot.
Opposing Cuba and Iran while defending the U.S. leaves you with no credibility as an objective and fair minded political observer, only a Right Wing fascist.
Nicaragua will only continue to bloom if the people are successful in their country being sovereign – without outside influences such as corporations or threats of national security. Whatever path that is, tread carefully before considering past mistakes of the USA way. It is time for Latin America to shine on their own agenda, without caving to the political games of the north, especially in a USA election year with politicians leveraging media for postering.
A few videos to ponder over on the USA struggles
1- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9oslI79-mU&feature=share
2- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgMx2F41XD0&feature=endscreen&NR=1
*3- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VlRirraaks
*4- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdas-Zyg9MU
*5- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ribF3Y6Icl8
*6- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HB4tUK6yJz8
The US administration approved the 2009 Honduran election. Hondurans voted in “a climate of harassment, violence, and violation of the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly” according to the Washington-based human rights group Center for Justice and International Law. As the vote took place, many of the members of the Honduran constitutional government remained in exile, including President Manuel Zelaya who was confined to an internal exile in Brazil’s embassy in Tegucigalpa. At the end of the day, Honduran electoral authorities published blatantly false voter turnout figures in an apparent attempt to convince the international community that voter participation was at an all-time high. Though the OAS refused to send electoral observers to monitor the voting process, the International Republican Institute (IRI) and the National Democratic Institute (NDI)—both recipients of U.S.-government funding and closely aligned with the State Department—sent observation missions that characterized the vote as “free and fair.” Ongoing press censorship and the violent repression of a peaceful demonstration on the day of the election, failed to dampen U.S. enthusiasm.
the November 2010 general elections were plagued with defects that were widely denounced long before the elections occurred. As international organizations and members of Congress fromboth parties pointed out, Haiti’s Provisional Electoral Council (CEP) barred the nation’s most popular party, the left-leaning Fanmi Lavalas, from participating based on unsustainable technicalities. Also, no effective measures were taken to ensure that the hundreds of thousands of Haitians living in camps as a result of the earthquake on January 12, 2010, would be able to access the polls. The United States failed to denounce these grave flaws. In fact, the Obama administration provided much of the funding for the elections and pushed for them to take place sooner rather than later despite the major logistical challenges brought on by the earthquake.
The United States’s negative role in the controversial 2010 elections didn’t end there. Following the election’s first round at the end of November, the United States forced the CEP to change the results based on an arbitrary determination made by an OAS “Expert Verification Mission.” This mission, in which the United States, Canada, and France played central roles, called for the CEP to switch right-leaning presidential candidate Michel Martelly from third to second place. This ensured Martelly’s participation in the second round of the elections and removed from the race Jude Celestin, the candidate backed by outgoing president René Préval.
The Center for Economic and Policy Research analyzed the expert mission’s methodology and determined that “the Mission did not establish any legal, statistical, or other logical basis for its conclusions.” Nevertheless, the United States not only supported the Mission’s recommendations but exerted decisive pressure. It suspended the U.S. visas of ruling party leaders and threatened to cut off of aid if the Haitian authorities did not agree to the change. The United States thus succeeded in further sapping the credibility of elections that were already seriously flawed.
Given the U.S. endorsement and direct support for extraordinarily flawed elections in both Honduras and Haiti, it can be challenging to understand the logic behind our government’s repeated and harsh criticism of alleged “irregularities throughout the Nicaraguan electoral process.” Though the recent vote in Nicaragua may not have been perfectly transparent, it wasn’t nearly as problematic as an election that excluded the country’s biggest party or an election held under a repressive dictatorship. How the United States can cast doubt on the legitimacy of the former and actively support the latter speaks volumes about the U.S. double standard when it comes to promoting democracy and human rights in the hemisphere. It also reveals how fundamentally unchanged U.S. policy toward the region remains since the Cold War era of “containment” and “roll back” policies targeting left-leaning movements.
Latin America and Nicaragua are growing economies and more importantly they are growing through union – CELAC, ALBA, UNASUR are all institution and mechanism that have recently been set up and that will make Latin America move forward independently and sovereignly.
All those failed organizations you mention are nothing more than justifications by Chavez and Castro to keep their “merianda de negros” alive and well, that’s all. It’s mostly the same attitude for both so called left or right politicians, time to work on honest and independent institutions much like the effort done by Chile, Brazil,Costa Rica and coming into the picture Colombia and Peru. In a few years all those “payasadas” originated by Chavez and Castro will be perfect examples of what NOT to do.
These institutions apart from Alba have been signed by all Latin American nations. So it’s not only Chavez and Castro. Pedro, you seem ill-informed….are you living in Miami?
The invasion of Haiti by the USA under a cloak of humanitarian aid (and the return of Aristid) ; the overthrow of Zelaya by US-trained Honduran military generals -just when the Honduran people were preparing to craft their own constitution; and during the attempted coup of Rafael Correa and the continued media attacks against the President by banker-and-families who controlled the media. This special interest of media no only occurs in Latin America, but in North America too.
The Honduran generals of the coup d’etat there were 4 generals out of 7 who were trained by military schools in the United States. And today one of those generals says he will run for presidency in Honduras in 2013, Romeo Vásquez Velásquez.
The USA doesn’t have to look far, but to their own 2000 elections, which was their own (electorial) coup d’etat triggered by the hanging-chad controversial of G.W.Bush own brother, Jeb Bush, as Governor of Florida that became the catalyst of violating the popular vote of Al Gore is an example that their electoral process is also corrupt.
And to his own country, Obama in turn, approved a bill that overthrows Americans rights to a free due process, violating their own constitution. Meaning any American citizen can be arrested without a reason and without a trial. Obama and the US Senate have violated their own American constitution put in place in the 1800s.
To claim that Peru, Colombia, and Costa Rica are model countries since they are under USA control is a poor choice and unsubstantiated.
I understand your frustration Pedro and sadly we will have to deal with the do-gooders liberals, as is usually the case in human history,with a war. Thing is this time will be a nuclear war, maybe it’s about time…
It’s coming:
Iran crosses another nuclear red line:
Iran has crossed another red line in its drive for a nuclear weapon with the announcement Sunday, Jan. 8 that the underground uranium enrichment site at Fordo near Qom goes on stream soon. debkafile’s military sources: 60 percent enriched uranium can be produced at this facility – just one step before weapons grade.
Israel’s Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned in a number of interviews to US media that once the Fordo plant becomes operational, Iran’s nuclear bomb program will become immune to military attack and be able to operate out of the sight of Israeli and Western surveillance.
Tehran has clearly not been deterred in its drive for a nuclear weapon by the stiff sanctions the US and European Union began imposing in the past week against Iran’s oil exports and its central bank.
The announcement Sunday confirmed the report from diplomats in the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency that Iran had begun feeding uranium gas into the underground centrifuges in late December ready for upgraded enrichment. “I would assume they could start if they wanted to,” said one official.
This is not just another election and Barack Obama is not just another president whose policies we may not like. With all of President Obama’s broken promises, glib demagoguery and cynical political moves, one promise he has kept all too well. That was his boast on the eve of the 2008 election: “We are going to change the United States of America.”
Many Americans are already saying that they can hardly recognize the country they grew up in. We have already started down the path that has led Western European nations to the brink of financial disaster.
[...] the exception of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuelan tovarishch Hugo Chávez, other participating governments are sending the equivalent [...]
Bayardo Arce is right…continuity is what is needed in Nicaragua right now. US gave about $100MM of “strings attached” aid and Ortega has proven that by widening the group of relationships the country can flourish. Infrastructure problems are getting solved and new jobs are being created at a record pace. As long as the growth continues it would be silly to make a change. Do we really want a democracy like the US? Pragmatism is what Ortega brings to the country and it is the only way for the country to succeed.
I agree! Monopolies don’t work for the consumer. Same thing for business and governments. Nicaragua is free to choose their business partners. The neo-colonial economic strategies are subtle but are slowly being counter balanced by other alternative models. So again the solution is being inclusive to all that want to help Nicaragua achieve prosperity! The USA wants exclusivity and puts conditions on any cooperation. That’s sounds dodgy!